<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jamie Cullum: The Pursuit (Album)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.music.co.uk/reviews/jamie-cullum-pursuit-album.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.music.co.uk/reviews/jamie-cullum-pursuit-album.html</link>
	<description>uk music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauren John</title>
		<link>http://www.music.co.uk/reviews/jamie-cullum-pursuit-album.html/comment-page-1#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.music.co.uk/?p=2335#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>Thank you for replying, we always welcome feedback on our posts, and it&#039;s useful to hear of things we can better explain and expand. I think the point you make about standard Jazz introductions isn&#039;t entirely relevant however, as I am simply giving my opinion on what I am hearing, whether it is traditional and true to the genre or not. Also every journalist comes at a CD from a different angle, 
 and with different writing styles, skill sets, and knowledge....the same goes for readers...so where some of his fans for example find the point of view of a pop fan interesting, other readers like you look for something different. It&#039;s natural and not to be slated. 
So a review is not necessarily going to be a run down of all the songs and their backgrounds, or an indepth analysis of musical arrangements. I had a press release and track by track rundown to refer to, and in that Jamie speaks of how he experiments with ways or recording and musical arrangements, but I appreciate some things can be taken in a different way. I have tried to be honest and fair, whether people agree with that or not is all part and parcel of the business we call music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for replying, we always welcome feedback on our posts, and it&#8217;s useful to hear of things we can better explain and expand. I think the point you make about standard Jazz introductions isn&#8217;t entirely relevant however, as I am simply giving my opinion on what I am hearing, whether it is traditional and true to the genre or not. Also every journalist comes at a CD from a different angle,<br />
 and with different writing styles, skill sets, and knowledge&#8230;.the same goes for readers&#8230;so where some of his fans for example find the point of view of a pop fan interesting, other readers like you look for something different. It&#8217;s natural and not to be slated.<br />
So a review is not necessarily going to be a run down of all the songs and their backgrounds, or an indepth analysis of musical arrangements. I had a press release and track by track rundown to refer to, and in that Jamie speaks of how he experiments with ways or recording and musical arrangements, but I appreciate some things can be taken in a different way. I have tried to be honest and fair, whether people agree with that or not is all part and parcel of the business we call music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
